Legal Opinion
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against King
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 2010No. 200,681-7PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 In 2007, the Washington State Bar Association (Association) charged Paul H. King with 10 counts of violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). The hearing officer found that eight counts were proved by a clear preponderance of the evidence due to his representation of a client while suspended from the practice of law and subsequent conduct during disciplinary proceedings. The hearing officer recommended Mr. King’s disbarment, and the disciplinary board (Board) agreed. Mr. King appealed this decision, arguing that the disciplinary process was so marred with due process and appearance…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StarczewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PlacideWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.