Legal Opinion

McKelvey v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 137, Calendar No. 36,468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of his wife’s injury at a highway intersection collision between an automobile driven by George McKelvey, in which plaintiff’s wife, Hazel McKelvey, was riding, and that driven by defendant on September 3, 1929. George McKelvey was driving in a westerly direction on the Muskegon-Cedar Springs highway, and at the intersection of Walker road his car was struck by that driven by defendant, causing the injuries to plaintiff’s wife, resulting in the damages which plaintiff sues for. The negligence of defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ayers v. AndaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Carey v. De RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wells v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Stephens v. KoprowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API