Legal Opinion

Carey v. De Rose

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 40,034PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Mrs. Carey, driver of the car in which the deceased was riding, according to her own version, looked before entering the intersection, had an extended view, saw no car approaching and without any distracting circumstances and without further observation entered the intersection and her car was struck.

Mrs. Carey testified:

“I stopped my car about a car length and a half to the south of the fence on the south side of the road. * * #
“The front end of my car was 18 to 20 feet south of the fence on the south side of the road. At that time I had an unobstructed view…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Molda v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Halzle v. HargreavesMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Richardson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Zuidema v. BekkeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Malone v. ViningMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ayers v. AndaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nelson v. LindermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API