Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Koprowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1940No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 41,095PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, suing as administratrix of the estate of Hilda Stephens, deceased, recovered a judgment for damages arising out of an intersection collision of defendant’s automobile and the car in which the deceased was riding as a guest passenger. The sole question here is whether the deceased’s host was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, which negligence would bar recovery under the rule of imputed negligence (Carey v. De Rose, 286 Mich. 321).

The collision occurred at the intersection of Second street and Lane avenue in the city of Grand Rapids on the 25th day of February,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Block v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Thompson v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Clark v. ShefferlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Buehler v. BeadiaMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. MacDonald v. SkorniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API