Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Andary

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1942No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 41,811PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the record before us it clearly appears that the driver of the car in which plaintiff was riding was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; and such contributory negligence is imputable to plaintiff. Defendant's motions for a directed verdict and later his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been granted. On such a record I cannot concur in affirmance of judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff's driver, Russell Clements, was proceeding in an easterly direction on a paved street which was 24 feet wide. Defendant was driving in a northerly direction on an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. OrmistonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Koehler v. ThomMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Carey v. De RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Nelson v. LindermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Sonfilian v. WiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Malone v. ViningMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ludwick v. HendricksMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. MacDonald v. SkorniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API