Legal Opinion

Francis v. Rumsey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1942No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 41,875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action for defendant, entered by the trial court notwithstanding a jury verdict for plaintiff. Defendant cross-appeals.

This case involves plaintiff’s claim for damages resulting from an automobile accident occurring about 10:45 on the evening of June 5, 1940, at the intersection of Sixtpenth street and Yan Eaalte street in the city of Holland. Plaintiff, about 48 years old, accompanied by his stepson, was driving his 1930 Ford car west on Sixteenth street. Defendant was driving his Ford pick-up truck south on Yan Eaalte street. Both streets…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Block v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Boerema v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ayers v. AndaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smith v. OrmistonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Malone v. ViningMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Beers v. ArnotMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stabler v. CopelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lacaeyse v. RoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. AckersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API