Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Dahlen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 12, 2006No. 34079-8-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Skip P. Dahlen appeals from a judgment on an arbitration award. The trial court struck Dahlen’s request for a trial de novo because he did not *848strictly comply with the local court rule for noting a trial date. We hold that the local rule requires a procedural step to aid the clerk in setting the trial, that the clerk failed to perform a required ministerial duty, and that Dahlen’s right to a trial de novo should be reinstated. We strike the trial court’s award of attorney fees as that award must await the outcome of the trial de novo. We reverse and remand.

Bridgewater, C.J.

*848FACTS

¶2 Tom…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Spokane County Ex Rel. Sullivan v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Evans v. MercadoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Darling Sons Int'l., Llc, Resp. v. Deatley Bros, Llc Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Julia Evans, Pets. v. Charity Edwards, Et Ano., Resps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API