Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Hapner
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 8, 2008No. 35797-6-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
187 P.3d 311 (2008)
Lea HUDSON, individually, Respondent,
v.
Clifford and "Jane Doe" HAPNER, individually and the marital community composed thereof; and Matthew Norton, a Washington corporation, Appellants.
No. 35797-6-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
July 8, 2008.
Elizabeth Ann Jensen, Attorney at Law, Fircrest, WA, Marilee C. Erickson, Reed McClure, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Benjamin Franklin Barcus, Kari Ingrid Lester, Ben F. Barcus & Associates PLLC, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
ARMSTRONG, J.
¶ 1 We granted discretionary review to consider whether a party who requests a trial de…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Glab v. JulianSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010