Evans v. Mercado
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Julia Evans sued her underinsured motor (UIM) vehicle insurers Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America.1 She submitted the case to mandatory arbitration under chapter 7.06 RCW. Metropolitan opposed mandatory arbitration, essentially arguing that the arbitrator lacked authority to enter a gross award (the total collision damage inclusive of payments already received from the tortfeasor and personal injury protection (PIP) benefits) exceeding the statutory limit of $50,000. Evans responds that nothing prohibits the arbitrator from determining her total…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sara Malvern, V. Mark MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- The Doctors Company, App v. Bennett Bigelow & Leedom, P.s., RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015