Legal Opinion

K & K Construction, Inc v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1996No. Docket 168393PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, P.J.

This is a regulatory takings case. Defendant Department of Natural Resources appeals as of right from a September 8, 1993, judgment of the Court of Claims in plaintiffs’ favor. The Court of Claims determined that a taking had occurred as a result of defendant’s decision to deny plaintiffs’ application for a permit to build a restaurant on a parcel of land on the basis that the land was protected wetlands. The Court of Claims awarded $3,245,256 for the property taken, plus interest of $1,574,522.60, and $459,400 for a temporary taking of part of the land. We affirm.

i

Plaintiffs own…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. K & K Const. Inc. v. DeqMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. K & K Construction, Inc. v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. K & K Const. v. DnrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. K & K Construction, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Department of Transportation v. VanElslanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API