Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. VanElslander

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1999No. 110386, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

In this condemnation case, the Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary ruling of the circuit court, regarding the manner in which zoning requirements might affect the proper appraisal of the property. 1 On leave granted, 2 we reverse. In doing so, we adopt as our own the following dissenting opinion written by Judge Bandstra in the Court of Appeals.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from an order denying reconsideration of the trial court’s previous order that excluded the introduction of an appraisal of property owned by defendants Archie and Mary Ann VanElslander. Because [we] find that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DeihmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. K & K Const. v. DnrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Highway Commissioner v. EilenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. K & K Construction, Inc v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Yates v. KeaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Silver Creek Drain District v. Extrusions Division, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Morinelli v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Department of Transportation v. Haggerty Corridor Partners Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API