Legal Opinion
K & K Construction, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1998No. Docket No. 106712PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
This case requires us to decide whether the denial of a permit to fill wetlands on the plaintiffs’ property constitutes a regulatory taking of the property without just compensation. On two separate occasions, plaintiffs applied to the Department of Natural Resources for a permit to fill wetlands on a portion of their property so that they could commercially develop the land. Both permits were denied, and the plaintiffs filed the instant action, claiming *573that the permit denials constituted a regulatory taking of their land. The trial court found that the permit denials effectively rendered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Forest Properties, Inc.(now Known as Rck Properties, Inc.) v. United States, and Big Bear Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Russell T. Anderson v. Charter Township of Ypsilanti, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- K & K Const. Inc. v. DeqMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.