White v. Clinton County Board of Commissioners
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.
This case involves the interpretation of R.C. 305.10, and its interplay with R.C. 121.22 (the Sunshine Law) and 149.43 (Ohio Public Records Act). White argues that these statutes impose a duty on boards of county commissioners to prepare minutes which reflect the substance of their meetings and provide some indication of the nature and direction of their discussions. A different reading, the appellant contends, would render R.C. 121.22 and 305.10 meaningless. The appellees, on the other hand, claim R.C. 305.10 does not require that minutes contain the type of specific information that White…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Coventry Towers, Inc. v. City of StrongsvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State Ex Rel. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. WHIO-TV-7 v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.