Legal Opinion

Coventry Towers, Inc. v. City of Strongsville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-1106PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s first and third propositions of law question the Board of Tax Appeals’ admission and use of the revised appraisal and valuation analysis prepared by Canitia. First, appellant contends that R.C. 5715.19(G) precludes the admission of such evidence. R.C. 5715.19(G) provides:

“A complainant shall provide to the board of revision all information or evidence within his knowledge or possession that affects the real property that is the subject of his complaint. A complainant who fails to provide such information or evidence is precluded from introducing it on appeal to the board of tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Twin Valley Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Clark v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nestle Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. City of Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Schneider v. KreinerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API