Balder v. Haley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This supplemental garnishment action arises from a personal injury action that was tried to a jury beginning in January 1985. See Balder v. Haley, 399 N.W.2d 77 (Minn.1987). The trial court concluded that appellant Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company was liable for interest on the entire judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of judgment creditors Michael and Zita Balder and intervenor Sie-ben, Grose, Von Holtum, McCoy and Carey, Ltd. (Sieben). We affirm.
FACTS
The action underlying this garnishment proceeding involved a gas water heater that leaked gas and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Davis v. Allstate InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Buckhannon-Upshur County Airport Authority v. R & R Coal Contracting, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Casper Lodging, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- May v. StreckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.