Legal Opinion
May v. Strecker
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 1990No. C8-89-1540, C5-89-1611, C2-89-2019PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The automobile in which respondent Amy May was a passenger was rear-ended by an automobile driven by respondent Charles Strecker who earlier had been drinking at appellant E.J.’s, Inc. bar. The action arising out of this incident was tried to a jury which returned a verdict finding E.J.’s 25% negligent and Charles Strecker 75% negligent. Amy May was awarded $445,227 in damages. E.J.’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or, in the alternative, a new trial was denied and judgment was entered in accordance with the jury verdict. Insurers for Strecker and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Jacobs v. DraperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Jones v. FleischhackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Uniprop Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Young v. 2911 CORP.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Wallin v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.