Pringle v. King
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Gila. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The appellee, Prank M. King, brought an action in the court below against Robert Pringle to recover the sum of six thousand dollars, which he claimed to be due him for services, as broker, in effecting the sale of certain property of the defendant, consisting of ranches, horses, and cattle. The complaint contained two counts, in the first of which it was alleged that “the defendant agreed with the plaintiff that plaintiff should have the right, power, and authority to negotiate and sell the said ranches, horses, and cattle for such price as the plaintiff might be able to effect, and that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
- Willard v. CarriganArizona Supreme Court · 1902
- Greer v. RichardsArizona Supreme Court · 1890
- Svea Insurance v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1900
- Newhall v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mayhew v. BrislinArizona Supreme Court · 1910