Legal Opinion

Willard v. Carrigan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1902No. Civil No. 771PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStreet, C. J.

Alfred Carrigan brought his action against the appellants and R. L. Yan Deren and Etta Willard, defendants, to recover the sum of ten thousand dollars as commission for the sale of mining properties. Findings of fact and judgment were for the plaintiff. The defendants G. M. Willard, W. W. Nichols, and M. A. Carrier appeal from such judgment.

Plaintiff’s complaint contained two counts. The first count alleged “that the defendants made and entered into an oral contract with plaintiff, whereby he undertook to act as a broker in procuring a purchaser for all said claims; and in consideration of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barter v. County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Henry v. MayerArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Jordan v. DukeArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Leeke v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bradstreet v. BradstreetArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Wright v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  3. E. D. Metcalf Co. v. GilbertWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. Iron Cap Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Banco De Sonora v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API