Legal Opinion

Newhall v. Porter

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1900No. Civil No. 726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

WRIT OF ERROR from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Graham. F. M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The plaintiff in error, Charles K. Newhall, claiming to he the surviving partner of a partnership alleged to have existed between himself and one George Smith until the. latter’s decease, and as such to have been in the possession of partnership assets consisting of a herd of cattle, some horses, and saddles, brought an action in the court below against the defendant in error, J. N. Porter, to recover damages for the alleged wrongful conversion by him of the aforesaid property. Porter, denying the claim of partnership, and averring the ownership of the property to have been in the said George…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Main v. MainArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Greer v. RichardsArizona Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Svea Insurance v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McGowan v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hays v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hays v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pringle v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API