Legal Opinion

Smith v. General Casualty Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2000No. 98-1849PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner Gary K. Smith (Smith) drove the last car hit in a three-vehicle collision. This collision, subsequently referred to as a chain reaction collision, was set into motion by a vehicle driven by an unidentified hit-and-run driver. In a suit arising from the accident, Smith brought a claim against General Casualty Company of Wisconsin (General Casualty), 1 demanding coverage under the uninsured motorist policy covering the vehicle operated by Smith.

¶2. Smith asserts that Wisconsin's uninsured motorist statute mandates coverage when an unidentified hit-and-run vehicle strikes an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Riccitelli v. BroekhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Theis v. Midwest Security InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. RomanshekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Reid v. BenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BurrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. DeHart v. Wisconsin Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API