DeHart v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 1. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals that reversed and remanded the circuit court's summary judgment1 concluding that the motor vehicle insurance policy provided to Wendy and Gary DeHart (the De-Harts) by Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company (Wis*568consin Mutual) did not provide uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for Wendy's automobile accident. The court of appeals decided that the physical contact element of a "hit-and-run accident" under Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4)(a)2.b. (2005-06)2 was met and the statute mandates UM coverage if the unidentified motor vehicle struck another…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SotoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Showers Appraisals, LLC v. Musson Bros., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Sands v. Whitnall School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.