Legal Opinion

DeHart v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2007No. 2005AP2962-FTPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals that reversed and remanded the circuit court's summary judgment1 concluding that the motor vehicle insurance policy provided to Wendy and Gary DeHart (the De-Harts) by Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company (Wis*568consin Mutual) did not provide uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for Wendy's automobile accident. The court of appeals decided that the physical contact element of a "hit-and-run accident" under Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4)(a)2.b. (2005-06)2 was met and the statute mandates UM coverage if the unidentified motor vehicle struck another…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. SotoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Showers Appraisals, LLC v. Musson Bros., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Sands v. Whitnall School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API