Legal Opinion

Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Romanshek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2005No. 2004AP740PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJon P Wilcox, J.

¶ 1. This case is before the court on a motion to bypass, pursuant to Wis. Stat. *307§ 808.05 (2001-02)1 and Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.60. We are once again called upon to determine whether the phrase "hit-and-run" within the definition of "uninsured motor vehicle" in Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4)(a)2.b. requires an insurer to provide uninsured motorist (UM) coverage when its insured is the victim of a "miss-and-run" accident. We decline to overrule our long line of precedent requiring physical contact in an accident involving an unknown vehicle in order for there to be a "hit-and-run" within the meaning…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. 1325 North Van Buren, LLC v. T-3 Group, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Estate of Stanley G. Miller v. Diane StoreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Ginger M. BreitzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Kristi Koschkee v. Carolyn Stanford TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API