Legal Opinion
Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 29, 2002No. 01-1140PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
*1329RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) held that the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA), 10 U.S.C. § 2306a (1988), required Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company (Aerojet) to disclose its receipt of additional sealed bids to the United States during contract price negotiations. Aerojet Solid Propulsion Co., ASBCA Nos. 44568 and 46057, 00-1 B.C.A. ¶ 30,855 (2000). Because knowledge of the undisclosed bids clearly was information a prudent buyer or seller reasonably…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Cessna Aircraft Company v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Rex Systems, Inc.,appellant v. William S. Cohen, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Unisys Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Campbell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Sanders v. Allison Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Allison Engine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States ex rel. Watkins v. KBR, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2015
- Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.