Unisys Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is the amount of a downward contract price adjustment to which the government is entitled because of concededly defective price information that the appellant Unisys Corporation sub mitted to the government during contract negotiations. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) held that the government is entitled to $746,737. Sperry Corp. Computer Sys., Defense Sys. Div., ASBCA No. 29525, 88-3 B.C.A. ¶ 20,975, at 105,976. Unisys contends that the amount should be $153,079. We affirm the Board.
I
A. The Truth in Negotiations Act…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- M-R-S Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Universal Restoration, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Sanders v. Allison Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Allison Engine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Houck v. City of Prairie Village, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.