Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Campbell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 5, 2003No. 6:95CV549-ORL-28DABPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANTOON, District Judge.
In this action the United States (“the United States” or “the Government”) and its relator, Albert Campbell, seek to recover damages from Defendant Lockheed Martin under the False Claims Act (“the FCA”) (31 U.S.C. § 3729) and the Truth in Negotiations Act (“TINA”) (10 U.S.C. § 2306a). Plaintiffs contend that Lockheed Martin withheld “cost or pricing data” from the United States Air Force in connection with contracts for the manufacture by Lockheed of LANTIRN pods, despite being obligated to disclose such data under TINA. Additionally, Plaintiffs assert that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- L-3 Communications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Secretary of State for Defence v. Trimble Navigation Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Sanders v. Allison Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.