Legal Opinion
Great Plains Crop Management, Inc. v. Tryco Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 10, 1983No. CV-82-52-GFPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, District Judge.
The defendant, Tryco Manufacturing Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Tryco”), has moved to quash service of summons and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction, or alternatively, for a change of venue. Tryco, an Illinois corporation, was served with a complaint and summons at its sole place of business, in Decatur, Illinois. Tryco asserts that exercise of jurisdiction by this court would offend due process and is not proper under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4B of the Montana Rules.
FACTS
Counsel for both parties…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Threlkeld v. ColoradoMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Grizzly Security Armored Express, Inc. v. Armored Group, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Macaluso v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. National Muffler Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.