United States v. National Muffler Manufacturing, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff opposes the motion.
By its motion, defendant National Muffler Manufacturing Company, Inc. (National Muffler) moves to dismiss the complaint, or, in the alternative, to quash service of process on grounds that the form of process was insufficient because the summons was materially defective and did not conform to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 First, defendant contends that the summons failed to conform to the requirements of Rule 4(b) because it lacked the signature of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Gianna Enterprises v. Miss World (Jersey) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Gipson v. Township of Bass RiverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
- Kramer v. Scientific Control Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Witthauer v. Burkhart Roentgen, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Timothy A. Cloyd v. Arthur Andersen & Company, Inc., and Roxanne LaineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Marrero Albino v. Vázquez EgeanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Cloyd v. Arthur Anderson & Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.