Legal Opinion

Macaluso v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1986No. 86 CV 2373PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

In this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, defendants move to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to quash service of process, due to insufficient process and defective service of process. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(4), (5).1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court quash*17es all attempts to serve process. Plaintiffs are granted twenty (20) days in which to effect proper service.

Facts

In this case there are two groups of defendants: (1) the “State Defendants”— the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”), along…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Gianna Enterprises v. Miss World (Jersey) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Gipson v. Township of Bass RiverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
  5. Infotronics Corp. v. Varian Associates Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Osrecovery, Inc. v. One Group International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Soos v. Niagara CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  4. United States v. National Muffler Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
  5. Cloyd v. Arthur Anderson & Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API