Legal Opinion

Grizzly Security Armored Express, Inc. v. Armored Group, LLC

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2011No. DA 10-0267PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Grizzly Security Armored Express, Inc. (Grizzly) appeals from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, that dismissed its action against The Armored Group, LLC (TAG) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We reverse.

¶2 We review the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Whether the Court may rely upon testimony on appeal from a vacated default judgment hearing.

¶4 Whether the District Court lacked personal jurisdiction over TAG.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶5 TAG sells armored vehicles throughout the United States and internationally. TAG’s website boasts that it operates…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Simmons v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cimmaron Corp. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Edsall Const. Co., Inc. v. RobinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. B.T. Metal Works v. United Die & Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Milky Whey, Inc. v. Dairy Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Montana State Fund v. SimmsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Buckles Ex Rel. Buckles v. Continental Resources, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Rooney v. City of Cut BankMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hartsoe v. TuckerMontana Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API