Legal Opinion
Affourtit v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 2, 2008No. 06-81CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
1. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.1
On February 2, 2006, the President and sole shareholder of Interaction Research Institute, Inc. (“IRI”), filed a pro se Complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging breach of contract by the Defense Logistics Agency of the Department of Defense (“DLA”). See Compl. at 1.
On September 25,1995, IRI entered into a contract with DLA to develop a “Customer Services Excellence System”2 for the Defense Contract Management Command (“DCMC”). Id at Compl. Ecnl. (a) 111. The contract…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Balbach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Diaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Howell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.