Legal Opinion
Diaz v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 27, 2016No. 16-138CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Attorney Representation for a Business Entity; RCFC 83.1(a)(3); Standing.
OPINION
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Pro se plaintiff, Kevin Diaz, 2 filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims on January 28, 2016, alleging that the United States Department of the Navy (Navy) wrongfully rejected his unsolicited proposal and “failed to comply with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 15.6 during the agency’s review process.” See 48 C.F.R. § 15.6 (2016). As relief, plaintiff seeks $1,400,000.00 in damages. Before filing a complaint in…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Brandt Development v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Diaz v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Monbo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Monbo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025