Legal Opinion
Lea v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 25, 2016No. 15-292CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Breach of Contract; Collateral Estoppel; Third Party Beneficiary, ORDER
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
This is pro se plaintiff Corey Lea’s third action initiated in the United States Court of Federal Claims arising from the same underlying facts filed within a two-year time period. Plaintiff alleges that, in November 2007, the now-dissolved company Corey Lea, Inc. obtained a loan from Farmers National Bank to purchase farm property.2 This loan was guaranteed by the United States Department *207of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) through…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mahoney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- 28 Trans, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Buel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Lea v. Secretary of Agriculture, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- R&R Conner Aviation, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.