Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Blanc
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1927No. Docket No. 1401PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The petitioners were arrested and are detained upon a warrant issued by the municipal court pursuant to a complaint charging them with conducting, operating, and carrying on “a certain plan and scheme and system of merchandising by means of an endless chain for the sale of silk hosiery and ladies’ underwear and men’s furnishing, . . . without first having obtained from the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles a permit so to do.” It is admitted that the acts complained of were contrary to the provisions of a municipal ordinance regularly adopted and approved by the properly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People's Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. Van WongAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
- People v. Van WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944