Legal Opinion

People v. Van Wong

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided December 1, 1958No. Crim. A. No. 3880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid, J.

Section 42.03 of Los Angeles Ordinance Number 77,000, the Municipal Code, was held invalid by the trial judge, who sustained a demurrer to the complaint against the defendant and dismissed it. The complaint charged the defendant with sale of and offer to sell a ticket admitting one to a Los Angeles Coliseum event, conjoining in the charges all the circumstances proscribed within 250 feet of the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum “upon and along a public street, sidewalk, alley, and publicly owned park and place.”(1) It is asserted that this a valid police regulation to prohibit the practice of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loska v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. Van WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API