People v. Van Wong
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtDavid, J.
Section 42.03 of Los Angeles Ordinance Number 77,000, the Municipal Code, was held invalid by the trial judge, who sustained a demurrer to the complaint against the defendant and dismissed it. The complaint charged the defendant with sale of and offer to sell a ticket admitting one to a Los Angeles Coliseum event, conjoining in the charges all the circumstances proscribed within 250 feet of the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum “upon and along a public street, sidewalk, alley, and publicly owned park and place.”(1) It is asserted that this a valid police regulation to prohibit the practice of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loska v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. Van WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958