Legal Opinion
People v. Van Wong
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
165 Cal.App.2d Supp. 821 (1958)
THE PEOPLE, Appellant,
v.
EUGENE VAN WONG, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
Dec. 1, 1958.
Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Doran, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.
George Chatterton, City Public Defender, for Respondent.
DAVID, J.
Section 42.03 of Los Angeles Ordinance Number 77,000, the Municipal Code, was held invalid by the trial judge, who sustained a demurrer to the complaint against the defendant and dismissed it. The complaint charged the defendant with sale of and offer to sell a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loska v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977