Legal Opinion
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 14, 2008No. 07-7156, 07-7166PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Current and former tenants in properties owned by BSA Limited Partnership contend that BSA unlawfully refused to accept their federal vouchers as payment for rent, in violation of federal housing statutes and the . District of Columbia Human Rights Act. The district court granted summary judgment for the tenants on the federal claims and for BSA on the Human Rights Act claim. We affirm the judgment in favor of the tenants but reverse the judgment in favor of BSA.
I
BSA has owned and managed a set of residential…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nautilus Insurance v. BSA Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Burbank Apartments Tenant Association v. KargmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- National Fair Housing Alliance v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Theodore Hayes v. Philip HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.