Nautilus Insurance v. BSA Ltd. Partnership
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company (“Nautilus” or “the Insurer”) brings this declaratory judgment action to clarify its duty to defend and indemnify its insured, defendant BSA Limited Partnership (“BSA” or “the Insured”), in a civil suit brought by defendants Bridgette Feem-ster, Sabrina Lymore, Mary Brown, Be-trice Harris, Michelle Hawkins, Shirley Holland, Dyanne Johnson, Lillian Johnson, Shirley Lattimore, and Dorothy Paul (collectively “Feemster Parties”) against BSA. 1 The underlying suit was brought by the Feemster Parties in the United…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nautilus Insurance v. Remac America, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Harleysville Preferred Ins. Co. v. Rams Head Savage Mill, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Selective Way v. NationwideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Gemini Insurance Co. v. Earth Treks, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Albert v. Truck Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.