Legal Opinion

Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 31, 2018No. 16-2692PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.

The Hayes family receives enhanced voucher rental assistance from the federal government, and a federal statute provides that enhanced voucher holders "may elect to remain" in their housing developments, even after their landlord has opted out of *36 the federal housing assistance program. 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(t)(1)(B). But the Hayes family's landlord, Appellee Philip Harvey, contends that this statutory right to "elect to remain" does not apply at the end of a lease term. Thus, according to Harvey, he is permitted to evict the Hayes family without cause once their…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Tomasi v. Twp. of Long BeachDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  3. Adolph Michelin v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026
  4. Christopher Thieme v. Warden Fort Dix FCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  5. Devorin v. Tata Consultancy Services, LtdDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API