Legal Opinion

Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 2006No. 04SC724PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MULLARKEY, Chief Justice.

I. Introduction

We granted certiorari to determine the meaning of the phrase “ordinary and necessary expenses” as used in section 22-63-202(2)(a), C.R.S. (2005), 1 and as applied to reimbursement for damages incurred by a public school district in this state when one of its teachers resigns without giving the statutorily required 30 day notice. 2 We find that the phrase “ordinary and necessary expenses” limits the damages a school district can recover from a teacher who resigns with insufficient notice to. actual expenditures incurred in finding the teacher’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Crowe v. TullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People v. YascavageSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. People v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Rohauer v. LittleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. BenavidezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Romero v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API