Legal Opinion

Romero v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 26, 2007No. 06SC586PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

I. Introduction

The issue presented is whether the court of appeals erred in holding that when an offender’s sentence to community corrections has been revoked, a court may resentence that offender to a longer term than the original sentence, so long as a hearing is held.1 Petitioner William Romero argues that increasing the offender’s sentence violates both section 18 — 1.3—301(l)(e), C.R.S. (2007), and double jeopardy. We affirm the court of appeals.

II.Facts and Procedural History

In May 2001, Romero pled guilty to one count of distribution of a schedule two controlled substance, a class…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Grant v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. People v. BenavidezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. JenkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Townsend v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Mounkes v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API