Legal Opinion

Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2009No. 07CA0987, 07CA0988, 07CA2342PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge J. JONES.

This case involves a dispute over a public works project. Plaintiff, Hamon Contractors, Inc. (Hamon), the general contractor for the project, sued the City of Louisville; Carter and Burgess, Inc. (C & B), the project administrator; and Craig Kitzman, the Assistant City Engineer. Hamon's claims against C & B and Mr. Kitzman were based solely in tort. As relevant to this appeal, the district court granted summary judgment in C & B's favor on all of Hamon's tort claims against it, granted summary judgment in Mr. Kitzman's favor on certain of Hamon's tort claims against…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Cacevic v. City of Hazel ParkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Re/Max, LLC v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  2. Doe 30's Mother v. BradleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Krol v. CF & I SteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Tara Woods Ltd. Partnership v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  5. Jorgensen v. Colorado Rural Properties, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API