Legal Opinion

Bolding v. Camp

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1928No. 1102-5014PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

By agreement of all parties the case made is stated as next shown:

“The sole question on this appeal is the liability of the said W. P. Bolding to the several appellees herein, and such liability, if any, rests alone upon whether or not under the proof made he was a partner with A. J. McNeece, A. L. Wylie, and his other codefendants, and, in the case of M. S. and L. I. Bennett, whether or not he was a mining partner with Ms said code-fendants, if not a general partner; and that if such proof was insufficient, a reversal hereof should be had as to all appellees, but otherwise it should be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ayco Development Corp. v. G. E. T. Service Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Smith v. RampyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Box v. Associates Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API