Legal Opinion

Harrington v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1964No. 11234PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

The State of Texas sued H. M. Harrington, Jr., Charles W. Lutes, Reid H. Allgood, John W. Baton, appellants, and Douglas Godfrey, individually and as members of Hal Company, a partnership, for penalties as authorized by Art. 6036, Vernon’s Ann. Tex.Civ.St.1 for the violation of certain statutes and rules and regulations of the Railroad Commission.

Following a trial by jury, judgments in varying amounts were rendered against all defendants except Douglas Godfrey as to whom a take nothing judgment was rendered.

Appellants’ first point is that the trial court erred in denying them…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. Axtell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Boaz v. White's Auto StoresTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Harrington v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Reynolds v. TiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Powell v. Forest Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Donnell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API