Legal Opinion
Lonegan v. Hasty
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 22, 2006No. 04 CV 2743(NG)(VVP)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, who are attorneys employed by the Legal Aid Society of New York, claim that, by secretly recording their conversations with certain detainees at the federal Bureau of Prisons’ Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”), located in Brooklyn, New York, defendants, a former warden of MDC and other employees of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), violated Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended (the “Wiretap Act” or “Title III”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522, and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sharyl Attkisson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Sandoval v. American Building Maintenance Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Turkmen v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.