Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Redeker

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided September 15, 1966No. Civ. 6-1773-C-1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before MATTHES, Circuit Judge, and STEPHENSON and HANSON, District Judges.

STEPHENSON, District Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS

Initially the Court will consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint filed against them. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d), hearing on the defendants’ motion was deferred until the trial. The contentions upon which the motion to dismiss is premised are essentially as follows: (1) There is no basis for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court in this matter; (2) the plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Grace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. Grace Line, Inc. v. Federal Maritime BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Starns v. MalkersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
  2. Kirk v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Samuel v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Russell A. Kelm v. William S. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  5. George Clarke v. S. RedekerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API