Legal Opinion

Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1974No. Civ. A. 71-1202PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

This is a class action brought by the named plaintiffs against the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania State University and Temple University (hereinafter referred to as Pitt, Penn State and Temple, respectively), certain named officers of those universities, and the Governor, Attorney General and Auditor General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. By Opinion and Order of this Court dated August 21, 1972 (56 F.R.D. 435), the plaintiffs were determined to' - represent all married female students who since 1967 have attended any of the three defendant…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hamid R. Kashani v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Robert Hall v. Medical College of Ohio at ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Dr. Raj P. Soni v. Board of Trustees of the University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Edward R. Jagnandan v. William L. Giles, President, Mississippi State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Mary C. Gray v. Union County Intermediate Education District, a Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API