Legal Opinion
Reginald N. Person, Jr. v. Carol A. Shipley
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2012No. 20S03-1110-CT-609PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
In Bennett v. Richmond, 960 N.E.2d 782 (Ind.2012), another case handed down today, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion under Indiana Rule of Evidence 702 by admitting certain expert testimony that was offered by a personal injury plaintiff in a rear-end collision case. In this case, we hold that the same trial court similarly did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony offered by a personal injury defendant in yet another rear-end collision case.
Background
In November, 2002, Carol Shipley, while driving a Buick Park Avenue sedan,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Spangler v. BechtelIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Doe v. Shults-Lewis Child & Family Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bennett v. RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Kolby O'Banion, Taylor O'Banion, Tim O'Banion, and Kelly O'Banion v. Ford Motor CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Carter v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Think Tank Software Development Corp. v. Chester, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- John Roberts v. Stephen Buennagel and Allstate Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.