Mary and Ronald McDaniel, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Christopher L. McDaniel v. Stephen W. Robertson, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Insurance (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Najam, Judge.
Statement of the Case
Mary and Ronald McDaniel (“the McDaniels”),, individually and as the administrators of the estate of their deceased son, Christopher L. McDaniel (“Christopher”), appeal the trial court’s judgment on their petition for excess damages from the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (“PCF»). 1 The McDaniels raise two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the evidence presented by the PCF with respect to Christopher’s life, expectancy constituted an impermissible new ai'gument on the issue of liability,
2. Whether the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Doe v. Shults-Lewis Child & Family Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- CUTCHIN v. ANONYMOUS HEALTHCARE PROVIDER 1District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.