Legal Opinion

Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Manuilov

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2001No. 73S01-0002-CV-119PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*455On Petition to Transfer

DICKSON, Justice

The defendant-appellant, Sears Roebuck and Co., appeals following a jury trial and judgment awarding compensatory damages of $1,400,000 to the plaintiff-appellee, Milan Manuilov, a 34-year old circus high-wire performer who was injured in 1988 while shopping at the defendant’s retail store. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Manuilov, 715 N.E.2d 968 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). We granted the plaintiffs petition for transfer, thereby vacating the decision of the Court of Appeals. The issues presented in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Barbara Kaiser v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Raess v. DoescherIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API