Legal Opinion

People v. Bartlett

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1990No. B045761PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

Lateshia Evette Bartlett was convicted by a jury of the sale or transportation of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352.) The jury found true the probation restriction allegation, as amended by the court, that appellant was “transporting and selling” a substance containing 28.5 grams or more of cocaine, within the meaning of Penal Code section 1203.073, subdivision (b)(1). On appeal, appellant contends that the Penal Code section 1203.073 finding restricting probation should be stricken and the matter remanded for resentencing because (1) the statutory restriction does not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Jason LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. People v. Warren, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. M.B.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. MUTUMACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API